Re: getaddrinfo: DNS round robin vs RFC3484 s6 rule 9, for etch
- To: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>, glibc@packages.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: getaddrinfo: DNS round robin vs RFC3484 s6 rule 9, for etch
- From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:44:56 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070928194456.GA28752@artemis.corp>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>, glibc@packages.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070928192444.GT25712@mails.so.argh.org>
- References: <[🔎] 18173.9263.180829.524894@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20070928171245.GC21309@artemis.corp> <[🔎] 18173.14391.208699.751436@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20070928182250.GA27982@artemis.corp> <[🔎] 20070928192444.GT25712@mails.so.argh.org>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:24:44PM +0000, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit (madcoder@debian.org) [070928 21:08]:
> > DNS RR is "broken" on Windows XP since SP2, Windows Vista, most *BSDs,
> > Redhat and Fedora, and probably any Linux distribution out there
>
> I was told it isn't broken on Fedora.
That's not what the glibc CVS says, and given Uli's position about the
new behavior of getaddrinfo I would be *very* surprised.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgp_sbrkgZUC4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: