Re: Bug#440638 closed by Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com> (Bug#440638: fixed in bos 1.1.dfsg-0.1)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, September 11, 2007 10:29, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
>
> > I suppose this will have to be uploaded to stable-proposed-uploads as
> > well, but what version number? etch and sid have the same upstream
> > version, so how do we avoid collisions?
>
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but what's wrong with the usual
> appending of "etch1" to the existing version number, i.e. 1.1-3etch1?
1.1 means the old upstream tarball, but that's not possible because the
tarball has to change.
There's fixed tarball, 1.1.dfsg. We could pick that, but then what debian
version? -0.1etch1 is already higher than the sid one. Sounds like -0etch1
would work, but how correct is that?
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Reply to: