Re: BinNMU for pam-keyring

To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: BinNMU for pam-keyring
From: Laurent Bigonville <bigon@bigon.be>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:04:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070828010444.562f22d0.bigon@bigon.be>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070827222808.GF1337@dario.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 20070827234500.cf606b7b.bigon@bigon.be> <[🔎] 20070827222808.GF1337@dario.dodds.net>

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:28:08 -0700
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:45:00PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> 
> > Please schedule a binNMU for pam-keyring now that a new (0.99.7.1-2)
> > version of pam is in unstable.
> 
> > pam-keyring_0.0.8-6, Rebuild against new pam version, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> 
> Why?

To get rid of the compatibility code used when pam_prompt is not
present (introduced by 0.99 versions) and use the native pam function.

Laurent

Attachment: pgpFz1hJUtsUH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BinNMU for pam-keyring
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

References:
- BinNMU for pam-keyring
  - From: Laurent Bigonville <bigon@bigon.be>
- Re: BinNMU for pam-keyring
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: MySQL transition 5.0->5.1 with new libmysqlclient16
Next by Date: Re: MySQL transition 5.0->5.1 with new libmysqlclient16
Previous by thread: Re: BinNMU for pam-keyring
Next by thread: Re: BinNMU for pam-keyring
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread