Re: binNMUs for new libgpod
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:47:15PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be
> > binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new
> > version):
> [...]
> > rhythmbox_0.10.1-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> could someone please give back arm and ia64? They didn't build because
> of some dependency problems, which might well be fixed in the past 11
> days.
Yep, given back.
> > kipi-plugins_0.1.4-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390
> > amarok_1.4.6-1+b1, rebuild against libgpod2, 2, alpha amd64 arm mips powerpc
> > amarok_1.4.6-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, hppa i386 ia64 m68k mipsel s390 sparc
> Hmm, a few of these still depend on libgpod1 and have as changelog entry
> "rebuild against libgpod1"... Let's try that again:
> kipi-plugins_0.1.4-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 2, arm hppa ia64 s390
> amarok_1.4.6-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 3, arm
> amarok_1.4.6-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 2, hppa ia64 s390
Hrm, wonder how that happened... well, scheduled now.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: