On Sonntag, 24. Juni 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Even though i see the severity of this problem, i would like to not > delay r1 even further. A reupload of apache2 means an additional > binNMU of apache2-mpm-itk. > > I am happy to fix that in r2, though. I agree with that. I was just unsure about the state of r1. Cheers, Stefan
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.