Re: Recommendations on timing of library transition builds?
On Sun, Jun 3, 2007 at 09:38:11 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> It's pretty much entirely arm at this point, which seems to be in bad
> shape. I'm not sure what's going on, but arm has dropped below 85% built
> and has been below 90% for quite a while.
>
Some of the buildds had to be stopped because their kernels were too old
for libc 2.5. The kernels have now been upgraded, AIUI, but someone
needs to restart the buildds, see [0], [1] and [2].
[0] https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=80
[1] https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=92
[2] https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=104
Reply to: