On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Perhaps we need more intermediate milestones, which is something which
> seems to be lacking in some areas (no goals for each milestone, no
I fully agree on this.
As a member of few teams in which no strong leadership is de facto
established (and this is generally good), I think all those teams will
benefit of knowing that they have to test-drive their next release
skills with some intermediate milestone; something like: ``X months
before the release you have to be ready on .. something ..''.
Given that the "X" and the "something" need to be internally defined by
the team I have no idea on how the RMs can enforce that, though.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature