On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:33:08PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:07:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > > > > need to do to get back in and release with lenny? > > > > > > requalify? > > > > And the requirements for that would be? > > > > AFAIK our major problem for etch was the gcc transition, which had deep > > well, news@11 you may want to read the thread about the libc earlier. > For lenny, m68k won't be supported by the libc if nobody works on it > properly. So the toolchain problems remains. Does anyone see any other toolchain issues (or other issues) besides TLS in libc? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature