Re: Is this serious for etch? [abi@grinser.de: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]

To: opal@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is this serious for etch? [abi@grinser.de: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:43:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070401184312.GP25115@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, opal@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070401182334.GA17427@opalsys.net>
References: <[🔎] 20070401182334.GA17427@opalsys.net>

* Ola Lundqvist (opal@debian.org) [070401 20:40]:
> I just got this bugreport and I agree that it is a problem.
> 
> Package: ntop
> Severity: serious
> Tags: etch-ignore

Obviously not.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- Is this serious for etch? [abi@grinser.de: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]
  - From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Is this serious for etch? [abi@grinser.de: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]
Next by Date: Please unblock nullmailer 1:1.03-5
Previous by thread: Re: Is this serious for etch? [abi@grinser.de: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]
Next by thread: Please unblock nullmailer 1:1.03-5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread