Re: Priority of libsasl2 in etch
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:17:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:01:34PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Regarding the section, moving to oldlibs should not break anything.
> > People will appreciate that deborphan does what it's supposed to do.
> > Could we please consider the section at least?
>
> Right, I have no objection to changing the section. I'm not convinced that
> dropping the package to standard priority is a good idea yet, I'll let
> others from the release team comment.
Section changed.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Reply to: