On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:16:03AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: Dear RMs, > on 2007-02-22 I got LyX 1.4.3-3 uploaded to unstable with a fix for > #411043 which is in some cases a bigger problem then I thought when this > bug appeared first. > > a) Please take a look at the diff between LyX 1.4.3-2 and 1.4.3-3 and > decide if the changes are suitable for the Debian/etch release. > I've attached the interdiff for your convenience. > > b) If you think a) is ok maybe you can pull a trigger to get it build on > the missing architectures and let it propagate to testing. first of all thanks to the person who made it possible that the package has been build on the missing architectures within the next 24h after I wrote this mail. Now I'd like to ask you (again) if you could hint LyX 1.4.3-3 into testing. The bug that will be fixed resolves a situation where LyX is nearly unusable in some cicumstances. I'd really appreciate if you could hint the package to testing. Thanks for considering, Sven -- If you won't forgive me the rest of my life Let me apologize while I'm still alive I know it's time to face all of my past mistakes [Less than Jake - Rest Of My Life]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature