Hi
I understand that you do not consider the update of kernel-patch-openvz
to be something that you can unfreeze that easily. I have been in contact
with Luk before and he promised to look at it, so Luk do you have any
other opinion about this?
Here are some arguments that it can be unblocked:
* No other package depends on this package
* Compilation for all supported architectures have been done, except for
ia64 as I do not have a build host for that arch, more than merulo and
it need to be in unstable for some time for that.
* Compiled kernel have been regression tested.
Kir, have you some other good arguments or specific error corrections
that you want to point out?
I just know that there are number of nasty bugs that have been corrected in this
version.
Regards,
// Ola
PS. Kir is the project manager for openvz.
DS.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:48:33AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org> writes:
* ntop
Correction of a crash and japanese translation
* cron-apt
Added missing dependency on cron
This is an important fix.
* dpsyco
Correction of a very annoying error message
* vnc4
Terminal handling improvement.
Not that important but useful.
Unblocked.
Thanks for that.
* kernel-patch-openvz
And finally I would like you to consider to accept the version
of kernel-patch-openvz that I have uploaded to experimental.
I know that this is a quite big change but there are a number
of reasons why it should be done.
I don't think this qualifies for a freeze exception, but maybe another
release team member has a different opinion.
Marc
--
BOFH #200:
The monitor needs another box of pixels.