Dear release team,
I have just uploaded a NMU of lsb, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
Please note that this package gives several rather annoying lintian
warnings:
W: lsb source: native-package-with-dash-version
E: lsb-cxx: package-depends-on-multiple-libstdc-versions libstdc++5 libstdc++6
E: lsb-core: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version depends: bsdutils
E: lsb-base: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version depends: sed
E: lsb-base: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version depends: ncurses-bin
I preferred not fixing these because I was unsure whether that would
be acceptable or not, and because for some of them, I was unsure about
the correct fix.
The NMU changelog is:
Source: lsb
Version: 3.1-23.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:12:58 +0100
Closes: 408177
Changes:
lsb (3.1-23.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload to fix pending l10n issues.
* Debconf translations:
- Portuguese. Closes: #408177
- Convert PO files to UTF-8, except Japanese
--
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature