Re: Bug#413208: Bug#413057: nfs-kernel-server: Exports dont work any more
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:19:44AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for etch,
> > and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big delta so I
> > don't see a reason to respin even if we did have version skew. (I.e., the
> > source requirements are still satisfied for d-i as much as they are for any
> > random other package that might happen to be built against a previous
> > version of libblkid1, no?)
> Yes, very true.
> Which I guess brings me to another question, and I'll *completely*
> understand if the release team says NO. If I'm going to do an uplod,
> and if the d-i images are going to be respun anyway, would you mind if
> I also slipstream in the following very low-risk patch:
> http://thunk.org/hg/e2fsprogs/?cs=1619c81226d1
Hmm, I think I'm going to say no to this one; it's a low-risk patch, yes,
but it's also a low-impact bug, so I'd just as soon not fiddle with it.
> After all, the function of release managers is to counteract
> developers' natural desire to fix "one last bug" or add "one last
> feature" when it might end up delaying the release, no? :-)
Exactly. :-)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: