> I have the intent to attempt to get this corrected but I would like to > > know whether maintainer or non-maintainer uploads of such packages in > > t-p-u with only changes to debian/po/*po would be OK for you. > > That would need to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Well, OK. Let's take a first example: glpi 0.68.2-1, the very first package version and actually the only one in testing introduced debconf templates and, therefore, has no translations. 0.68.3-2, in unstable has 3 translations...and slightly fixed templates (respecting the developer's reference recommendations). So, bringing the debconf templates and their translations from unstable would slightly enhance the version in testing. Would I ve authorized to do that upload (or have the maintainer, Pierre Chifflier, do it)? Planned patch attached.
Attachment:
glpi.patch.bz2
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature