[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please allow util-vserver 0.30.212-1 into etch



Hi

I fully agree with Micah that this should be part of stable.

Regards,

// Ola

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:35:20PM -0700, Micah Anderson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Dearest release team,
> 
> Due to changes in the vserver patch necessary for 2.6.19+, changes in
> the user-space util-vserver package were required. The changes between
> 0.30.211-6 and 0.30.212-1 are important.
> 
> Version 0.30.212-1, which is in unstable, works for both 2.6.18 and
> 2.6.19+, and has been in unstable for nearly 90 days now without any
> regression problems reported specific to this version.
> 
> As such I would humbly request that it be unblocked and allowed to
> migrate to etch to make our lives a hair easier down the line. If
> 0.30.211-6 is left in etch, anyone upgrading to a newer kernel will find
> some significant weirdness.
> 
> Micah
> 
> ps - although I am not listed officially as the maintainer of the
> package, I am listed as the co-maintainer and you will see that I have
> done a significant number of the uploads of this package in the last
> year and commits to the svn repository. Nevertheless, I am CC'ing the
> maintainer as a courtesy, I believe he will not disagree with this
> request. :)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFF6NDY9n4qXRzy1ioRAiPoAKCiy9PDpdrn+cP92Ag/46nbC84MpQCdEgWm
> gXomXyGKuFj6HASW6Iv+1pw=
> =hUAl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  ola@opalsys.net                     654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://opalsys.net/                 UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: