Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net> writes: > In the Debian XML/SGML group we were discussing, if we should try to get > docbook2x 0.8.7 into Etch (atm in experimental). The question: Would you > allow this update? There is one important issue, that is fixed with this > release: it also builds with the libxml-sax-perl version currently in > Sid. There are further several upstream fixes improvements > (http://docbook2x.sourceforge.net/latest/doc/changes.html). The > docbook2x package does not have any reverse-dependencies, that could > break. But there are quite a few packages that build-depend on it, so I would prefer to not allow it into etch. Marc -- BOFH #326: We need a licensed electrician to replace the light bulbs in the computer room.
Attachment:
pgpaR7RfyL98g.pgp
Description: PGP signature