On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:57:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > I'll let the RMs decide whether iceape and icedove upgrades are less > > problematic since they don't involve reverse dependencies. > > Less problematic, certainly. > > Hopefully these updates won't have the problem of past mozilla > new-upstream-version "security" fixes, where every single file shows up in > the diff because of cvs keywords? Nope, they won't. But FWIW, here is a diffstat of the upstream differences between 1.8.0.9 and 1.8.0.10 for a xulrunner checkout (which includes some stuff from icedove and iceape, but not all). The diff itself is 5MiB. Mike
Attachment:
diffstat.bz2
Description: Binary data