> The version in testing has an RC bug, #409750. But an uncoordinated > template change is enough of a reason for me to reject this update and > require a targetted fix via t-p-u. I know Christian will have this covered > no matter what, but the l10n update policy is intended for the benefit of > users of all languages, not just French. :) Another possibility is also handling a call for translation updates lasting for 3 days (the templates changes are very minor and can easily be updated very quickly by translators) and then upload a new version of the package in unstable. 11 translations were complete for the debconf templates before that upload. I think that it's possible to fix them in a few days. Whatever path is chosen by the release team and the maintainers, this call for updates has anyway to happen and I'll do it immediately, and propose a patch to the package maintainers on Wednesday Feb 21st. That would mean that a t-p-u upload would be less relevant (unless the current unstable package has other changes not suitable for etch, from the RM point of view) Christian, is that OK with you? --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature