Re: Please unblock (Re: I ask to put libapache2-mod-fcgid into etch)
Hi Tatsuki,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:27:07PM +0900, Tatsuki Sugiura wrote:
> >>> In Message "Re: I ask to put libapache2-mod-fcgid into etch"
> >>> <45AC90E7.3070609@nemui.org>,
> >>> Tatsuki Sugiura <sugi@nemui.org> said;
> > >> I'd like to put libapache2-mod-fcgid into etch certainly.
> > >> Actually I do't resolve libapache2-mod-fcgid bugs yet.
> > >
> > >> But previous version 1.10-1.1 works properly. 1.10-1 has no bugs
> > >> over 3 monthes, and NMUed -1.1 for apache2.2 dependencies.
> > >
> > >> Can I ask to put libapache2-mod-fcgid 1.10-1.1 into etch?
> > >> Or, do I need surely to fix current version to contain the
> > >> package into etch?
> > > Since 1.10-1.1 is no longer in the archive, if you want it to be included in
> > > etch, it will need to go through unstable again with an epoch.
> > > Or you can figure out how to fix 2.0 and ask that version to be considered
> > > instead.
> > Thanks both.
> > At first, I'll upload again previous version with epoch to include
> > libapache2-mod-fcgid into etch surely.
> Sorry for late.
> I made new package that was rewinded to 1.10.
> Would you unblock libapache2-mod-fcgid?
> And, can I upload 1:1.10-2 now to unstable? (I donot upload yet.)
Yes, I would accept this as a fix for the package.
> # After that, do I need to add "sid" tag to RC bug related this?
You should mark the RC bug as closed in package version 1:1.10-2 since that
version is not affected by the bug.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: