[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

iasl (acpica-unix) 20060912-4 to unstable or experimental (or nothing)?


aba (Cc-ed) followed the issue. So basically -4 fixes some forced FTBFS
due to bugs in the iasl code generation and load/store unaligned
accesses (#406034 and #406558) as a followup to #401153.

Now, is it worth trying to push for -4 in etch? the only package
build-depending on iasl is qemu which already includes workarounds so
maybe -4 can wait (and never appear as there's a new upstream release


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: