Re: Fix to #378346 has gone missing, complete with nasty version inconsistency in gail
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> But, according to the bug log at http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gail.html,
> that release is the following:
> gail (1.8.11-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> * Revert changes of 1.8.11-2 as release team explained that a simple
> re-upload is enough for non-bin-NMU-able packages, and that bin-NMU-able
> packages should be taken care of by them.
> * Update watch file to track stable upstream releases.
>
> -- Loic Minier <lool@dooz.org> Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:59:56 +0200
I think you looked at the experimental uploads. I certainly didn't
upload with "UNRELEASED" as the target dist and it certainly would be
rejected by our archive software.
> And, as bug #406378 reports, the behavior of bug #378346 is indeed back.
It seems like a similar problem indeed. Whether it's the same, I can't
tell yet for sure.
> Loic: if you concur in this diagnosis, can you please reassign #406378
> to gail appropriately?
I don't think there's enough information to be sure that it is the same
bug as #378346; it might even not be gail related. I'll request the
information to the submitter, especially a backtrace of the crash,
preferably with debug symbols, is really needed. If I don't get his
reply, you're welcom to reassign to gail if you see the crash is in
libgail.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to: