Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
Mike Hommey wrote:
> Could you explain why qemu should add the device for something that is
> remotely in relationship with it ?
Remotely? I think qemu and kqemu are quite close.
Besides that this is definitely off-topic here, I agree that a package
in main should not make a compromise to support a package in non-free if
it is bad for the package in main. However, that kqemu is in non-free
should not be a reason against creating of just a device node in qemu.
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist