[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try

Mike Hommey wrote:
> Could you explain why qemu should add the device for something that is
> remotely in relationship with it ?

Remotely? I think qemu and kqemu are quite close.

Besides that this is definitely off-topic here, I agree that a package
in main should not make a compromise to support a package in non-free if
it is bad for the package in main. However, that kqemu is in non-free
should not be a reason against creating of just a device node in qemu.

Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Reply to: