Re: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-20 and gcc-4.1_4.1.1-21 for testing
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:14:51AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please consider for testing:
>
> gcc-4.1:
>
> 4.1.1ds2-20 is for four weeks in the archive without regressions
> report to the BTS, -21 fixes important bugs for non-release archs.
> Maybe Lucas could rebuild the testing archive with the -20 or -21
> packages before letting theis version into testing.
>
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds2-21) unstable; urgency=high
>
> * Enable -pthread for GNU/Hurd (Michael Banck). Closes: #400031.
> * Update the m68k-fpcompare patch (Roman Zippel). Closes: #401585.
>
> -- Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:35:06 +0100
>
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds2-20) unstable; urgency=low
>
> [Matthias Klose]
> * Update to SVN 20061115.
> - Fix PR tree-optimization/27891, ICE in tree_split_edge.
> Closes: #370248, #391657, #394630.
> - Fix PR tree-optimization/9814, duplicate of PR tree-optimization/29797.
> Closes: #181096.
> * Apply the libjava/net backport from the redhat/gcc-4_1-branch.
> * Apply proposed patch for PR java/29805.
I suggest we approve it because at this point it is more likely there
are packages in Etch that FTBFS with -19 than packages in Etch that
FTBFS with -21 since -20/-21 were used to build packages that went to
Etch.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: