On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:34 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Indeed, so I think re-adding a libsasl2-gssapi-mit binary package to > cyrus-sasl2 would be the best option. Is this in progress? Yes. I'm hoping to hear something from Sam with regard to the Kerberos 4 package, but I'm going to upload a new version of cyrus-sasl2 with a libsasl2-gssapi-mit transition package and the neccessary Depends/Conflicts/Replaces dance no later than tomorrow. (I know that Sam is very busy with work, and so am I, so I'm focusing on the code more than on email at the moment. Sorry if things appear to have stalled because of this.) -- Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe@paniq.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part