Re: auctex update
>>>>> AB == Andreas Barth [2006-12-12]
AB> Actually, on seeing these changes, I considered to refuse the
AB> changes. On a second thought, I'm still approving the changes, as
AB> they were uploaded just in time. But this is not going to repeat.
That's your call, I do not dispute. However, it would be helpful if you
could comment a bit more on your statement: I was under the impression
(<20061211100850.GF2560@mails.so.argh.org>) that
[...]
AB> here are the guidelines for changes that will be accepted into
AB> testing during the freeze:
[...]
AB> - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional
AB> or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;
AB> - translation updates and
AB> - documentation fixes.
Which part of the changes between auctex 11.83-2.1 and auctex 11.84
rises up your concerns?
--
Thanks, Davide
Reply to: