Re: ruledispatch, turbogears and turbojson removals from testing (was: Re: ruledispatch REMOVED from testing)
Ping on the request below? =)
Em Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:18:04 -0200
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> escreveu:
> [not subscribed, please CC]
>
> Hello,
>
> ruledispatch has been removed from testing and, I believe, because of
> that turbogears and turbojson went out also; I uploaded a fix for the
> bug mentioned here (and at the hints file) on 12/04, and it should be
> fixed right now in unstable.
>
> Is there any action on my part necessary to get those packages back
> into testing?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Em Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:39:20 -0700
> Debian testing watch <noreply@henning.makholm.net> escreveu:
>
> > FYI: The status of the ruledispatch source package
> > in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
> >
> > Previous version: 0.5adev-4
> > Current version: (not in testing)
> > Hint: <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
> > #20061204
> > Bug #375528: ruledispatch: FTBFS: cannot stat
> > `debian/python-dispatch/usr/share/python-support/python-dispatch/RuleDispatch-0.5a0-py2.3.egg-info':
> > No such file or directory
> >
> > The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
> > reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
> > were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
> > reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
> > probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
> > actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
> >
>
>
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>
http://www.debian.org/ | http://kov.eti.br/
Reply to: