On December 12, 2006 at 5:15PM +0100, he (at ftwca.de) wrote: > >>> Could you please allow wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 with the 2 line > >>> patch to fix an IMAP connection bug for testing-proposed-updates > >>> to replace wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-1? > >> Could you describe the bug and show the diff (for example by filing a > >> bug with a patch)? > > Submitted to BTS. See Bug#402629. > > OK, looks fine. Please do an upload to testing (a version number like > 0.20061015-2 seems to be OK for that) fixing this (and only this) bug. I've uploaded wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 to testing-proposed-updates with the following patch. Please push it to etch. ---- --- wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015-1/debian/changelog +++ wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +wl-beta (2.15.4+0.20061015-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium + + * elmo/elmo-imap4.el: Fix "IMAP error: No `OK' response from server", + patch from upstream CVS version. (closes: #402629) + + -- Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@debian.org> Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:47:41 +0900 + wl-beta (2.15.4+0.20061015-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (CVS trunk on 2006-10-15) --- wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015-1/elmo/elmo-imap4.el +++ wl-beta-2.15.4+0.20061015/elmo/elmo-imap4.el @@ -981,8 +981,8 @@ ;; Skip garbage output from process before greeting. (while (and (memq (process-status process) '(open run)) (goto-char (point-max)) - (forward-line -1) - (not (elmo-imap4-parse-greeting))) + (or (/= (forward-line -1) 0) + (not (elmo-imap4-parse-greeting)))) (accept-process-output process 1)) (erase-buffer) (set-process-filter process 'elmo-imap4-arrival-filter) ---- Thanks, -- Tatsuya Kinoshita
Attachment:
pgpdfdeBygVNL.pgp
Description: PGP signature