On Monday 11 December 2006 09:15, Steve Langasek wrote: > > sarge: aspell: Depends: aspell-bin, aspell-en | aspell6-dictionary > > sarge: aspell-en: Depends: libaspell15 (>> 0.60) > > > > etch: aspell: Depends: libaspell15 (>= 0.60), libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), > > libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.0), libncursesw5 (>= 5.4-5), libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.0), > > libaspell15 (= 0.60.4-4), dictionaries-common (>> 0.40) etch: > > aspell-en Depends: aspell (>= 0.60.3-2) > > > Looks like the new libaspell15 conflicts with aspell6-dictionary, which > is the virtual package provided by the old aspell-$lang packages, and > the new aspell doesn't depend on the new dictionaries, it only has a > recommends on aspell-en | aspell-dictionary | aspell6a-dictionary. Seems to me a bug in package management: aptitude should consider upgrading the individual dicts a better solution to resolve the conflict than removing them. Having aspell depend on individual dicts is a no-op as you want to able able to choose which dicts to install. > Do you think this warrants a bug on aspell? Is there a way to resolve this in aspell packaging then?
Attachment:
pgpmUbTGNJFSC.pgp
Description: PGP signature