[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#401961: conflicts with libneon26, making most neon-using packages uninstallable



Package: libneon26-gnutls
Severity: serious

Hi,

bazaar now got NMUed and it now builds against libneon26-gnutls. Which
isn't a problem in itself.

The Problem here is that libneon26 and libneon26-gnutls are *NOT*
parallel installable. This causes bazaar to indirectly conflict with
anything linked against the "normal" openssl linked version.

This especially is bad for me, since the OOo debian/ is in bazaar and
OOo uses libneon26 (and no, I will not build against gnutls if I don't need
to, and that might get problems later anyway. too)

Packages affected (linked against "normal" neon):

Package: libneon26-gnutls-dev
Package: libneon26-gnutls-dbg
Package: tla
Package: libneon26-dev
Package: libsvn1
Package: openoffice.org-core
Package: sitecopy
Package: davfs2
Package: libneon26-dbg
Package: subcommander
Package: libsvn-dev

Now all of them are uninstallable along bazaar.

The real solution is to make -gnutls and the "normal" one (-openssl)
both installable at the same time.

See curl.

Regards,

Rene
- who now will have to violate bazaars license if we wants to get a bazaar which can
  be installed alongside OOo :/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-powerpc
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: