On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 19:51 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > I still recommend asking for the out-of-date ia64 binary to be removed from > unstable pending resolution of the guile-1.8 bug, as I had said before. If > you elect to reintroduce lilypond 2.6 for ia64 as a separate source package, > that's ultimately between you and the ftp team to decide; but I don't think > it's warranted to allow an ia64 lilypond package into etch that doesn't > correspond to the current sources. Ok, I've filed such a request against ftp.debian.org with severity serious. Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part