Re: 2.6.19, kernel-package problems and what are our plans for etch ...
Teodor-Adrian MICU <teodor.micu@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it is a good ideea to adopt 2.6.19 for etch if its possible.
Please don't unless we can't avoid it. Each time we bring in a new
kernel, those of us who maintain external kernel modules have to do a
bunch of work to catch up with all the API changes. For full 2.6.19
support on all platforms I believe I'd need to pull patches from CVS for
OpenAFS, whereas the current packages are stable and functioning on
2.6.18.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: