Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

To: md@Linux.IT
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:46:09 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] u1hoduwt8hq.fsf@kempis.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060807233320.GA11158@wonderland.linux.it> (Marco d'Itri's message of "Tue, 8 Aug 2006 01:33:20 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 20060805002218.GA5295@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 87u04qds8z.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <[🔎] 20060806150912.GA13937@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] u1hlkq1v2xt.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060807073211.GA23414@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] 20060807082331.GB30191@mail.lowpingbastards.de> <[🔎] 20060807084242.GA25954@powerlinux.fr> <[🔎] u1hirl4unyi.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060807232910.GA10908@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] u1h3bc8unri.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <[🔎] 20060807233320.GA11158@wonderland.linux.it>

md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:

> On Aug 08, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
>
>> We Do Not Distribute Non-Free Software No Matter How Much It Helps Our
>> Users.

> Now think about why we do not do it.

It does not matter.  Different members of Debian have different
reasons.  We have all agreed to work together on the basis of the
Social Contract, which says that We Do Not Distribute Non-Free
Software No Matter How Much It Helps Our Users.

Thomas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Frederik Schueler <fs@debian.org>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)

Prev by Date: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Next by Date: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Previous by thread: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Next by thread: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread