Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:11:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] easi3t$cku$1@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <[🔎] 20060803051728.GA20490@doctormoo.dyndns.org>

In linux.debian.kernel Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm> wrote:

>What can be done about this?
Accept that most people do not consider this a problem?

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

References:
- Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@fastmail.fm>

Prev by Date: Re: D-I Beta3 preparation - more requests
Next by Date: Re: BinNMU to get rid of libtasn1-2 dependencies
Previous by thread: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Next by thread: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread