Re: temporary oot-modules for 2.6.16
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> is it ok to have temporary packages for oot-modules build against kernel
> 2.6.16 (temporary as in 'as soon as waldi has his linux-modules-extra
> ready)? squashfs and unionfs can't go into testing without dropping
> archs atm, therefore the wish to have them in testing, at least, without
> these archs.
> Packages are good and uploaded, currently in new and waiting for RM
> approval.
Do you mean ftp team approval? The RMs have nothing to do with approving
packages out of NEW.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: