also sprach Marc Haber <mh+debian-release@zugschlus.de> [2006.07.26.1632 +0100]:
> While we're at it, I am very much in favor that we start accepting
> binary package signatures again. We were on the right way to assure
> package integrity on a package level when our archive suddenly stopped
> accepting signed binary packages.
Where's the added benefit if our archive serves binaries with
signatures? I am actually in favour of this, but I do remember that
this was the question neuro threw back at me when I brought it up in
Mexico.
Cheers,
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
"i must get out of these wet clothes and into a dry martini."
-- alexander woolcott
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)