On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:01:54AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:16:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Anyway, the script I'm using for this is smart enough that it won't pick up > > any false-positives for packages you've already uploaded, because it knows > > not to try to binNMU packages that are sourcefully out-of-date on an > > architecture. > > Which is why, all I should need to know is the list of packages that are > > being renamed. :) > BTW, didn't we decide to add a 'ocaml-abi-<version>' virtual package which > would be depended on by all ocaml packages, so this one can be used as root of > the rebuild tree, without waiting for a list of any kind ? Or was it in the > kernel discussion that i proposed such an idea ? > Steve, do you think that this would be a good idea ? It doesn't seem to have any relevance to the question of binNMUing. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature