Fwd: Bug#401660: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#401660: Library upgrade for exiv2
Could I obtain some direction from the release team?
Will you allow the exiv2 library transition to go forward or would you like me
to revert the version of digikam in unstable/ etch?
Or is there some other option available?
Mark
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Bug#401660: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#401660: Library upgrade for exiv2
Date: Saturday 09 December 2006 10:15
From: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Cc: KELEMEN Peter <Peter.Kelemen@cern.ch>, ufraw@packages.debian.org,
389711@bugs.debian.org, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>,
401660@bugs.debian.org, fuji@debian.org
On Saturday 09 December 2006 09:59, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mark Purcell (msp@debian.org) [061209 10:54]:
> > The discussion on debian-release seems to of died down and there doesn't
> > appear to be any dissent against uploading.
>
> Stop. We are really unhappy with transitions at the current time.
>
> The only reason that I didn't send a "please don't do it"-mail was that
> I wanted to discuss with Steve whether we could do an exception in this
> case.
Thanks Andi,
I see two options.
1. Take the library transition of exiv2 forward, or
2. Revert the version of digikam in etch to 0.8 via an epoc upload to
unstable which doesn't have this issue as it doesn't use exiv2.
I'm pretty happy with either option, but understand you maybe looking at a
greater picture.
Please let me know which way you would like to go.
Mark
_______________________________________________
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
-------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: