Re: New upstream releases for bluefish and docbook-xsl for Etch

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New upstream releases for bluefish and docbook-xsl for Etch
From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:01:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061119130131.GA21525@bee.dooz.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061119123720.GL11356@borges.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 1163775261.5768.28.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 20061119123720.GL11356@borges.dodds.net>

On Sun, Nov 19, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Um, gnome-devel is an important reverse-dependency.  We can't just drop
> the meta-gnome2 package from etch if bluefish ends up broken, after all.

 If need be, you can NMU meta-gnome2 (arch: all) via TPU, or in
 unstable, without notice and drop bluefish.  Especially gnome-devel is
 only a convenience meta-package.

-- 
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
        10 SIN
        20 GO TO ROBOT HELL             -- Temple of Robotology

Reply to:

References:
- New upstream releases for bluefish and docbook-xsl for Etch
  - From: Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net>
- Re: New upstream releases for bluefish and docbook-xsl for Etch
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: New upstream releases for bluefish and docbook-xsl for Etch
Next by Date: Re: Proposed library transition: sword, bibletime, gnomesword
Previous by thread: Re: New upstream releases for bluefish and docbook-xsl for Etch
Next by thread: Re: New upstream releases for bluefish and docbook-xsl for Etch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread