[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcj/java status

Steve Langasek writes:
> so in the absence of any movement in this area, I still need to
> know what Debian is going to do with gcj on ARM for the upcoming etch
> release.

in the worst case, remove the binaries built from gcj-4.1,
ecj-bootstrap-gcj.  How many build-dependencies will be broken? Didn't
check, but it shouldn't be that many, because most packages are binary

Reply to: