[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?



On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:09:53PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > August 16 birthday party in Breda, I discussed this with Jeroen Van
> > Wolffelaar who told me that in theory, it should not be very hard to
> > create a suite in dak to allow us to have a mostly-etch distribution;
> > one that is only slightly different from the 'real' etch. Given their
> > track record, I suspect (though I haven't asked) that the security team
> > would not object to supporting such a release.
> 
> My spare time is too limited to care about m68k. I'd suggest you prepare
> the m68k binary updates from the regular source updates available on
> s.d.o on your own.

Could m68k still do security building out of wanna-build?

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: