[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] Re: Upload new version of ruby-pkg-tools?


    Sorry, I forgot to reply to this message.

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:32:56PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > 
> >     We, the Ruby Extras Team, have a package (ruby-pkg-tools) with some CDBS
> > classes and other build-related tools. Usually Ruby library packages
> > Build-Depend on ruby-pkg-tools, so I guess we should contact the Release
> > Team before uploading a new version.
> [...]
> Does this change prevent any existing packages from building?

    It shouldn't be a problem at all. The change is simply setting a directory
in the default options to setup.rb, the installer. That is, the important
change is:

------------------------------------- 8< -------------------------------------
--- 1/class/ruby-setup-rb.mk    (revisión: 787)
+++ 1/class/ruby-setup-rb.mk    (revisión: 788)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 include /usr/share/ruby-pkg-tools/1/class/ruby-common.mk

 DEB_RUBY_SETUP_CMD = setup.rb
+DEB_RUBY_CONFIG_ARGS = --siteruby=$(DEB_RUBY_LIBDIR) --siterubyver=$(DEB_RUBY_LIBDIR)/$(cdbs_ruby_ver)
------------------------------------- >8 -------------------------------------

    Just to try to be sure, I have written a small script to do very simple
regression tests, and I tested about half of the Ruby packages. The file list
is exactly the same, except for hobix (the affected package), of course.

    I would like ALL MAINTAINERS to PLEASE REBUILD their packages with the
latest SVN version, just to be completely sure, but...


Esteban Manchado Velázquez <zoso@debian.org>
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
Help spread it through the Net in signatures, webpages, whatever!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: