Re: BinNMU to get rid of libtasn1-2 dependencies
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:46:35PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2006-07-31 Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 10:36:24AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> On 2006-07-20 Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> Could you please schedule a +b2 binNMU for amd64 and s390? These two
> >> archs had an old +b1 binNMU and where not rebuilt. (I'll try to
> >> provide this kind of information when I request a rebuild next time.)
> > Queued now.
> Built and uploaded, now. ;-)
> In which form would I need to provide NMU requests to generate as
> little work for you as possible? Is this ok, or is their another
> representation you'd favour (perhaps you need the complete Debian
> version for example)?
> gsasl (amd64 and s390 +b1, all archs except s390 need a rebuild.)
> thanks, cu andreas
The ideal form would be
[package]_[source-version], [reason], [binNMU number], [list of archs]
repeated for each (package,binNMU number) tuple.
I've queued the gsasl binNMUs now.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.