On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:20:13AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > although tetex-base is 11 days old, it has not entered testing. I have > been told previously that the scripts should now be clever enough to > detect that it has to go in with tetex-bin in one run without manual > hinting, so what's the problem? The cleverness has been disabled again; it can only run without OOMing when the number of candidate packages is reasonably low, AIUI, and it's been too high again of late. But that's not the real issue: > The update-excuses at http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=tetex-base > say that the binary packages tetex-doc and tetex-base are both "buggy > (1>0)", however, the tetex-doc bug is present in all versions (nonfree > documentation), and the tetex-base bug is present *only* in testing (and > in sarge). > Am I doing something wrong? Bug #338638 in tetex-base is *not* marked as being specific to stable/testing. You have to mark the bug as *closed* in the current version of the package, not "notfound". Please review the BTS version tracking documentation posted to d-d-a last July. And please close the bug. :) Anyway, a force hint is still needed for the other bug, since britney doesn't know about version tracking yet; so I've added this now for tetex-base. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature