On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:17:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > There are several packages relevant for the installer that have what looks > like minor problems keeping them from being built on some arches. > - gtk+2.0-directfb (2.0.9.2-12) > Needs to be retried on mipsel; problem should be fixed with new gcc. > - parted (1.6.25.1-1) > Needs to be retried on mips/mipsel; problem should be fixed with new gcc. Someone said these were being held in reserve for tests on upcoming autobuilders; I've asked Ryan to confirm. > - cdebconf (0.91) > Failed on alpha and ia64 with strange build dep error; a simple retry > may fix this. No, this is someone trying to be clever and hard-coding a dependency on libc6 into libgtk+2.0-directfb0. The correct dependency on alpha and ia64 is libc6.1. (I have no idea what the alternative on "| libc" is supposed to do; *nothing* provides "libc" on alpha, and even if it did, it'd be bloody worthless as a dependency. We have sonames in our lib package names for a reason!) > - partman-auto (46) > Strange fakeroot failure; a simple retry may fix this. Yes, built successfully. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature