Re: [RFC] xulrunner, shlibs, and dependencies.
Mike Hommey wrote:
> - Now, the problem is that we can't really use the sonames correctly,
> because if we succeed in the clue stick batting, we'll have different
> sonames, which, in the long term, would be painful. So, I'd like to
> provide a dummy gecko-x.y-serial or such package, which would correctly
> depend on the libxul package (with strict version if necessary), and the
> .shlibs in the libxul-dev package would say to depend on the
> gecko-x.y-serial package.
Couldn't you just use a Debian-specific so-name/version? (As in
libxul.so.d1 (d for Debian) or libxul-debian.so.1 or something...)
Doesn't look cool, but seems more simple.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
Reply to: