On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > I assume we're talking about FTBFS bugs which theoricaly should be reported > as serious (we have a few GNU/kFreeBSD bugs in the style of #307475, too). FTBFS are only serious if: - It build previously on that arch. Basicly, it comes down to that it prevents migration of the package to testing. And: - It affects a released arch. Kurt