Re: Bug#311615: ettercap: [CAN-2005-1796] buffer overflow in ec_curses.c

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Roger Leigh (rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org) [050602 20:10]:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:54:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> [ettercap]
> >> Release Team: please will you accept this for sarge?
> >> Is high urgency still OK, or should I make it critical?
> >
> > At this point, it's fairly likely that security fixes will need to go into
> > sarge via the security team, regardless of upload urgency.
> 
> OK.  I've since uploaded it, and I've mailed the security team about
> it.  It's currently built for 6 arches.

Well, I added an approval hint for it - but whether it makes it in time
or not is not decided yet.


Cheers,
Andi