Re: gcc-defaults, gcc-3.3, gcc-3.4 for testing

[Gerhard Tonn <GerhardTonn@gammatau.de>]

Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
>
> sorry the delay. the noise doesn't affect the transition of -12 to
> testing. As Kurt pointed out in
>
>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/03/msg00073.html
>
> some packages may have slipped into sarge, which were built with
> gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9. AFAIK you are unable to tell from the stripped
> binaries, that it's built by this compiler version. Maintainers may
> still use this compiler package ... Some buildds did pick up this
> compiler version as well, namely mips and mipsel packages were
> uploaded. The s390 buildd was upgraded as well, but AFAIK packages
> built with this gcc were not uploaded to the archive, but rebuilt a
> second time (Gerhard, please confirm).

Yes, there were 6 packages built with -9 on s390 and uploaded, but I 
have done a binary NMU with the latest compiler for them in the meantime.

Regards,
Gerhard