Re: strace 4.5.6-1.1
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:01:02PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:56:58AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:58:04AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > > I did an NMU to strace to fix a sparc-only ftbfs bug. This was done
> > > after the base freeze. No new bugs have been reported. While not a
> > > major issue, I think it would be nice to have strace in sarge that can
> > > handle 64-bit sparc binaries.
> >
> > > 4.5.6-1 was in unstable for over two months on the other
> > > architectures.
> >
> > But a new upstream release has now been uploaded to unstable within the
> > past two days, suddenly making this a much different proposition.
> > Unless the upstream diff is very small, I'm afraid this isn't likely to
> > get into sarge now.
>
> There is an RC bug on strace regarding s390 support. With multiple
> architectures affected, I'm inclined to accept the new version; I'm
> reviewing the upstream diff now.
The upstream diff from 4.5.5 to 4.5.8 looks fairly sane having eyeballed
it quickly, and 4.5.8 has been in unstable for some months. The recent
NMU diffs are small and look correct. Approved.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: